Come back to me on that.
The point is that in November, we as a committee decided to include specifically documents that had originally been blacked out on the grounds of relevance. In fact, the government had tried to broker a compromise to exclude those documents it considered to be irrelevant. We refused that, and we insisted that the documents and content that the government had previously said was irrelevant be included for your eyes to see. That is why the motion is very clear that the only exceptions are supposed to be those found in subsection 69(1) through subparagraph 69(3)(b)(ii) of the Access to Information Act. Those sections deal exclusively with cabinet confidentiality. The government was not authorized to exclude whatever it considered irrelevant.
You're now telling us that it applied an exemption that wasn't in that motion. Is that true?