That's right, because the only justifiable exclusion was for a cabinet confidence. Now you're telling me that we're just supposed to believe the government when it says that these additional redactions dealt only with things that were, in its eyes, not relevant.
I suspect the government believes nothing is relevant. If there were a smoking gun in the WE scandal, it would say, “Oh my goodness. That's not relevant. You don't need to see that. We'll just put a bit of black ink over it.” That's specifically why we insisted that you and not the government be responsible for determining relevance, but you're now revealing today that it has blacked out all kinds of content—potentially whole pages or more—on the grounds that it didn't consider them relevant.
Is there anything inaccurate about what I've just said?