Sure, I understand.
The reason I ask is that it says “any redactions necessary”, but then it says including “personal information” and “privacy”, which suggests to me that there could, in theory, be redactions made that were necessary for other reasons. If the government interpreted that to mean the legislative standard that, as in your argument previously, has some public interest in being served.... Can you confirm your earlier testimony that, in fact, the redactions that were made were entirely consistent with that legislative standard?