Yes, here is what I would like to add.
Let me give you the example of Mont Sutton, where restaurant income dropped by 75%. In addition to that variation in income, and given that all resorts closed in March last year, there were huge losses in income in the last part of the ski season. Then the summer season began. For most resorts, that is really a time when money is spent and no income generally comes in. This year's ski season is over, and, once again, our expenses have reached a certain level.
For a number of resorts, the 22% of unused, deferred income, as Mr. Juneau mentioned, represents expenses that they cannot make. They have to protect that income for next season. That once more weakens a company's ability to do upgrades or to reinvest and continue its progress into the future. These are also important arguments for maintaining the emergency wage subsidy beyond June. It's very important for ski resorts and tourist businesses.