Okay. I guess I have to agree with Mr. Julian, then.
There is a difference when a motion is put on notice and will be distributed to committee members. I think it goes without saying that it must be done in both official languages, and I would agree in principle wholeheartedly that any written material of any kind at the committee must be available in both languages.
However, I think members have to have the ability to make a motion at the table, and each language is of equivalent use. That's why we have translation. To say that it must be in writing before it can be debated would really cause difficulty for the practical functioning of the committee. That's my reaction, if I understand this motion correctly.