It's all a matter of policy choices that the government makes or could make. For example, if we were to look at more aggressive tax compliance measures, either legislative or administrative policies in terms of actually enforcing more aggressively the legislative pieces that are already on the books, that could contribute to narrowing the fiscal gap of $25 billion. That is the difference between what should be paid to the government, if everybody fully complied and paid the amounts owed under the legislation, and what the government actually ends up collecting. Plugging some of that gap could allow the government to either spend or reduce taxes, depending on policy choices the government would decide to make.
There's also the possibility, as you mentioned, Mr. Julian, of increasing taxes, or rather levying new taxes, on corporations or individuals. These are all policy choices.
As your humble servant, parliamentarians, it's not up to me to comment on whether one should be implemented or not. It's for you collectively to decide as parliamentarians, but additional revenues, of course, could lead to more government spending on programs or reducing other types of taxes.