That's a very good point, sir. We often face the same issue when we are looking at policies or costings that apply nationally. When we look at the territories, the data is not as robust. We often imply that the impacts would be broadly similar in the territories to what they would be in the provinces, but we all know that the realities are different, especially when it comes to social issues. A guaranteed basic income is a very good example of a social policy that would have impacts that would probably be very different in the three territories from what they would be in provinces such as Ontario, Quebec, Alberta or B.C. because of the very different structures and natures of the populations.
In that case, especially in the case of a GBI, it would be very useful to have solid, robust data related to the territories and their inhabitants.