I'll turn to Sean, because I asked him if he could put something in writing that basically spells out what the proposal was last night.
I should report to the committee that I did talk to the law clerk as well. Certainly, he'd be willing to come before the committee. Basically, what he said to me was that the original motion did not request a cabinet confidence. Therefore, the documents on the cabinet end were consistent with the committee's order. For him to go to the original motion on the other documents, other than cabinet, he would need to see the underlying originals so that they could attest as to whether they were done properly. We talked about the areas where the public service does redact based on the Access to Information Act and the Public Service Employment Act. Regardless of that, he said he would need to see the underlying documents, and then he could attest as to whether they did meet the committee's request.
I'll turn to you, Sean.