Thank you, but I'm still a little confused.
The NRC has had the ability all along to produce vaccines. Obviously, it was all hands on deck, so the NRC would have been consulted and you sought a legal opinion. What was the threshold? Is it half a million vaccines a month? Is it a million vaccines a month? Is it 100,000?
I mean, at some point, given the NRC's capability, there must have been a definition or a response that meant that the NRC wasn't actively involved in vaccine production.
Of course, as we know, we're trailing badly behind the United States. They're close to 40% fully vaccinated. In Canada, it's just over 3% fully vaccinated. We've moved to a model that is putting one shot in—despite the fact that manufacturers have expressed concerns about that—because of the supply shortage.
I'm interested in knowing whether there was ever a precise decision coming back from justice saying that the NRC can't produce beyond half a million a month or it can't produce beyond 100,000 a month and as a result, the NRC wasn't part of the solution.