I think I have a solution, and I'd be curious as to how Mr. Julian, Mr. Fraser, Mr. Ste-Marie and whoever else would comment on this. We could simply say “including all documents the government provided the law clerk in August”.
It would then read, “that the committee order that by November 24, 2020, the Government provide the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel with all documents as originally requested in the July 7, 2020 motion moved by the Member for New Westminster-Burnaby, including all documents the government provided the Law Clerk in August, without any redaction, omission or exclusion except as would be justified in sections and subsections 69(1) through 69(3)(b)(ii) of the Access to Information Act”.
That would just clarify that the entire bundle is coming back, this time with all of the redactions removed except for those justified under section 69.