Thank you.
Yes, Peter, I don't think that's the case. In fact, part of the motion brings the Clerk of the Privy Council here to explain why the particular redactions were made. I don't anticipate that this motion creates wiggle room for the government to use a different reason for the redactions than was given before.
I only hesitate, as you pointed out, because.... The government is going to respond to this motion. Then the law clerk will come and say whether they've satisfied the motion or not. If the law clerk says no, the motion we've discussed today does not preclude us from immediately coming back to the debate we've been having over the past number of weeks.