I apologize. I didn't want to shout in anybody's ear.
Since we have about 1,500 pages substantially or completely redacted, it's disturbing, quite frankly, to me that you don't have the ability to answer more fulsomely the questions we are asking you. That, of course, was the objective in bringing you here—not the theoretical approach, but rather to have a sense of why things were redacted so substantially.
I have two questions flowing from that.
First off, when you testified on July 21 to us, you stated that there were two cabinet discussions about the WE Charity. Can you confirm that those two discussions were subject to the cabinet confidences?
Secondly, a disturbing number of pages are marked “not relevant”, including references directly to the Canada student service grant. Can you confirm with us how many pages that were marked as “not relevant” were redacted before they were sent to the law clerk? To an untrained observer's eyes, they are very relevant.