Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I thank you for your answer, but it's very clear what the motion stated. I was the one who moved the motion. There were matters of cabinet confidence and national security being excluded from the request. That has been a justification for some of the redactions, but the redactions went far beyond that. As you've pointed out, there's a whole number of other categories that didn't reference what the committee clearly indicated.
I have two questions. First, do you understand that when the committee asks specifically for documents, it's not the prerogative of the government to decide unilaterally on a different approach? That's why we're currently still discussing—though it's suspended—a privilege motion. Second, why wouldn't the Privy Council and public servants follow strictly what the committee actually requested back in July?