We may invite you back at that point.
That said, Mr. Dion, I'll focus on the theory of the issue. I want you to speak about the responsibility of people who redact a document. I understand that a process requires documents to be redacted to protect cabinet confidences and confidentiality. That's fine.
Earlier, with Mr. Shugart, I saw that between 12 and 25 individuals, not including some supervisors, see all the documents. Mr. Shugart is ultimately responsible for the redaction. From an ethical standpoint, given the disclosure obligations resulting from the committee's July 7 motion, and given the restrictions on redactions, what's the level of reliability? How can we verify that the redacted material was redacted correctly? If there was a redaction error, for example, if an individual decided to redact a section that shouldn't have been redacted, how would the committee know?