We understand that.
In your initial remarks, you said, “Therefore, for the purposes of the office’s ongoing examinations, I respectfully ask, Mr. Chair, that you recommend that the House waive the privilege associated with witness testimony before the Standing Committee on Finance in the context of its study on WE Charity and the Canada Student Service Grant.”
I'm kind of in the position of “I don't know what I don't know” that you mentioned earlier. I know how that happens, but I have a question for you myself, and this is what I don't know:
It is public testimony. Can you not use that public testimony?