Thank you very much.
For the sake of clarity, I'm going to answer in English
You probably remember that Laurentian was brought under the CCAA legislation. There was a report or a research study done on that situation after the fact by the Auditor General of Ontario. Her conclusion was that the legislation is inappropriate for public post-secondary education institutions, that it was unnecessary and that other alternatives that would have led to a much more favourable outcome for the institution, students, faculty, other employees and the community would have been possible.
It's not the right legislation for dealing with financial challenges that post-secondary institutions face. It doesn't serve their public mission. It was designed for a different situation in the private sector. So we think this is important, particularly given the significant public investments that still go into public post-secondary institutions, although they've declined, unfortunately.
In the case of Laurentian, the effect was obviously also on northern, indigenous, and francophone communities, which were very affected. The public mission of the university was damaged by the imposition of inappropriate legislation.
I hope that answers your question.