I can't think of any examples off the top of my head, but the reality is that we need all of those things. We're not suggesting that we don't need to increase rental housing more generally, but the reality is that deeply affordable housing really needs significant subsidy.
If you want non-profits to be building it, they need significant capital grants, but they also need ongoing subsidies. When you're renting units at less than market value and deeply less than market value, as we're suggesting is needed if we're looking at rent geared to the lowest-income renters, then you're going to need ongoing subsidies, and that means operating agreements.
Part of the challenge is the loss of even the public housing supply across the country—and this, again, is more of a provincial issue—because we're not maintaining the budgets to do the maintenance. Again, you have units falling into disrepair and becoming vacant because they're in such poor repair.
There are multiple things that need to be done, then, but we maintain that if we don't focus on the lowest-income renters, the group of people who are in most dire need.... We're not going to solve this problem if we just keep developing market-level and above, or even just slightly below.