Those are two very different things you raised there, so maybe I'll deal with them separately.
The day care programs did help to significantly increase the proportion of women, and young women, in the workforce at a time when we had a really tight labour market. I would characterize that as something—to the governor's earlier description—that added to supply. In a very tight labour market, it did help the supply of labour.
The measures to address climate risk are a good example of something with a very long lag, as the governor described earlier. The effects of climate risk are more indirect.
You can have an extreme climate event. For example, with the forest fires we experienced this summer, our estimate is that they took about a half a point off of GDP for the second quarter. Longer-term programs that mitigate those risks will hopefully, over time, to the degree that they can, reduce the number of extreme climate events. That would be helpful.
That is a very good example of something with a very long lag and something that might, in the near term, add to demand more than it would add to supply.