Well, I'll say two things.
One is that competition is a good thing. I wasn't being glib about that earlier.
If you look at the Canadian economy, one of the things we know is that export-oriented firms tend to have higher productivity than more domestic companies. That suggests—that looks like—competition, and the Competition Bureau has actually recently done a fairly broad study, and I think there's some useful analysis there.
The other thing is that competition results in stronger productivity growth. Stronger productivity growth pays higher wages. Higher productivity growth sustains a rising standard of living, and it would be great to have higher productivity growth in Canada. That makes everything easier.
Coming back to monetary policy and your comments around the most vulnerable and about inequality, I'll say two things.
First of all, it is the most vulnerable members of society who are suffering the most from high inflation. They are feeling the brunt of affordability more than everybody else. They can't just move downmarket. They're already at the bottom of the market. Much of their spending is already on necessities. You can't cut back on that. That's why it is so important that we get inflation down. Inflation is a tax that disproportionately affects the most vulnerable members of society.