I clearly understand where you're going with your question.
My point is that, in provinces like Manitoba and Quebec, we have hydroelectricity with the cleanest inputs possible. What we're looking for on the carbon tax is for those who must emit carbon, i.e., farmers. When you use it for your heating, etc., you must do that, versus those who have the ability to lessen greenhouse gas.
We also believe we should be incentivized to use that hydroelectricity. Manufacturing here comes across as green, right away. Saskatchewan, Alberta and some other provinces, when they moved from coal to natural gas, got all sorts of credit, whereas we are already the 97% student looking to bridge that 3%. What we're looking for there is a 3% playing field. The issue in Manitoba is that we will be on the ESG side and able to attract business here because of that greening. That is where the money should be going.