First, there's a bit of a conceptual difference here. I think it's important. We don't measure specifically the cost of living, per se. We have other measures that I've talked about, such as market basket measure and poverty, and we talked about household expenditures by quintiles and so on. However, the CPI is not a true measure of the cost of living per se, because you see decisions that are delayed, substitutions that happen and all sorts of different decisions that [Technical difficulty—Editor] when faced with fiscal challenges.
The CPI is a measure of consumption and how it's changing on a consistent basis over time. It's not that we don't care about the cost of living—of course we do—but as I said, that is not built into the CPI as a constant measure of looking at both the price change and the changes that Canadians make in order to adjust to those kinds of changes, such as delaying or accelerating certain things.
From a consumption perspective, the basket is a very good representation of what it is that everybody.... Why do I say that? It's because the survey of household spending takes every single dollar that a household is spending and reconciles it. All of the categories in the CPI account for pretty close to 100% of the expenditure of that household.
We talked earlier about assets and the amortization of those assets and investments. There's a whole set of decisions about RESPs and RRSPs and all of those aspects, not to mention the asset valuation over time and the difference if you're a renter or if you're an owner. Over the course of a lifetime, you have to look at all of those aspects as well. We do measure those, but they're not as frequent. We will look at those kinds of patterns and see what changes there are.
I hope that helps.