All right.
Thank you for those very clear and specific questions about the bill we are here to discuss.
When it comes to affordability, we agree that we need programs to encourage the construction of affordable housing. We have such programs. In the fall economic statement, we set out an additional billion dollars precisely for that construction.
We believe it's important to look at supply as well. In Quebec and across Canada, more housing is needed. We believe measures are also needed to stimulate housing construction, period. The decision to eliminate the GST on the construction of rental housing is meant to encourage the construction of rental units overall.
I want to make two other points.
First, by creating more housing, we are helping everyone who is looking for an apartment, including those who have less. When more units are on the market, rents become more affordable.
Second, the measure is based on the construction of rental units. As you know, people who have to rent tend to have less money. By encouraging developers to build rental properties instead of condos, as you pointed out, we are helping those who are less fortunate. This will help make life more affordable.
We also understand that targeted measures are needed to support affordable housing.
In response to your second question, I wouldn't want to comment on a specific situation without having all the information. I don't think that's a good idea. However, we are happy to have a discussion with you. What I can tell you now is that I hope the intent behind the bill is clear: we want to encourage the construction of new units, not give money to people who were already building housing.