And, the part you didn't read, is that it removed clause 3 from the original motion, which is the clause that makes reference to Danielle Smith.Give me a break, guys.
This is not unlike what we witnessed in the House last night where we saw two Conservative members get up to speak to anti-scab legislation and they never once spoke to the bill, never once mentioned the term “strike”, never once mentioned the term “lockout”, never once talked about replacement workers in any relevant sense. This is my point. When it's politically uncomfortable for them to talk about something, they don't. They then make up other things to talk about or they insert other things—