We've heard about the trickle-down theory of it not mattering where you invest in the spectrum, but is it not also the case that investments in the social and affordable end of the housing spectrum actually trickle up?
You have people renting market housing but can't afford it and they're cutting pills and skipping meals. They're doing lots of things to make their market rent—for those who can—but by transitioning those folks into units that they can properly afford, that creates more room in the market rental space for folks who can afford it but just can't find it.