I appreciate the question.
I'll say a few things specific to the Bill C-56 changes.
Market studies have proven effective, even without subpoena power, to have a certain amount of directional impact on markets. We can think about the bureau's ride-sharing market study and their work in the telecommunications switching study. Obviously, those studies will be far more enriching when they can actually understand the real market dynamics at play and then be able to make recommendations in transparency both to consumers and to governments.
The efficiencies defence essentially empowers them to ensure that they actually have the tools to stop mergers that will potentially harm markets, harm competition and ultimately harm Canadian consumers.
The vertical collaborations is actually quite important because it expands the construct of what looks like competition in a marketplace to recognize that it's not just two competitors facing off against each other, but that actually they're using other players within the market structure to get anti-competitive outcomes.
All of that means they'll now have tools in their tool kit to really go after some of those particularly difficult or challenging aspects of the market structures that are harming prices, overall Canadian choice and ultimately competition.