That's good. The clerk is nodding.
The same thing goes for the concerns discussed in the same article regarding the scoring criteria. It said that the program design “did introduce a bias into the program that did indeed see large urban centres—where Conservative MPs are generally under-represented and New Democrats are significantly over-represented—receive more attention from the [rapid housing initiative] while smaller municipalities received relatively less”.
I'm wondering if maybe the clerk or the witnesses could arrange to table with the committee what the scoring criteria are for the rapid housing initiative.
Am I seeing nods?