Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I am going to start by commenting on what Ms. Davidson said about the voluntary disclosure program.
I think that in many cases in Canada, this program has strayed from its purpose. For example, it is being used as an escape hatch for people who are trying to structure transactions in connection with tax havens so they don't have to pay their fair share. When they get caught and are held to account, they use this program, so that goes against its actual purpose. These people are not penalized in any way; they are just asked to pay what they were required to pay in the first place.
In Quebec or in other countries, like the United States, there is a truly significant penalty when a person gets caught or uses a program like the voluntary disclosure program. That program is an incentive for clients and big corporations doing this kind of structuring. They tell themselves it is worth it to try to commit the fraud, because, anyway, the little rap on the knuckles they get doesn't hurt. This situation has got to change. I wanted to make that comment.
My question relates to what Ms. Hunt said at the beginning of the meeting and also somewhat to what Mr. Hallan talked about.
Why does Canada rank less favourably than the other countries in terms of what is done to combat these crimes?
Ms. Hunt, if I understood correctly, the fact that there is no police force dedicated to financial crime or money laundering.
Does Ms. Hunt or anyone want to answer my question: can you explain why there is no such police force? What arrangement has been made at present to have that kind of service? Should each province have its own specialized police force that would work in coordination, given the legislative system in the federation? Could you answer all these questions in a few minutes?