I'm not weighing in on the validity or the merit of Mr. Chambers' motion yet. I'm saying two things. One is that I did note that some of the things were beyond the scope of the discussion we had today.
I'd like the motion to be put forward in both official languages. The committee works based on that rule and we should always follow it.
Because I haven't seen the list of documents and information that Mr. Chambers is requesting, I can't form an opinion on the matter.
As I mentioned, if the witnesses are prepared to produce the information we discussed today, that's fine with me. However, I'm not prepared to rule on a motion that has not been introduced in both official languages.