Thank you for that.
One of the other differences with the U.S. tax credit, the 45Q, is that theirs is a production tax credit. It's ongoing, looking at year after year. Ours is different. It's an investment tax credit. That funding is provided up front.
A concern I've heard about this tax credit is that carbon capture and storage projects haven't actually met what they're expected to meet over time. We've had some experience in Canada with, for instance, the Boundary bay dam project in Saskatchewan, where only about 50% of the carbon was actually captured.
Given that this money is provided up front in a tax credit, what integrity measures are provided over time to ensure those targets are actually met and what impact will that have on the tax credit itself that's advanced to the company?