There's a laundry list, of course, but we focus on the big areas in which there's still room for improvement.
As I mentioned, on the merger side, it's taking that structure seriously and ensuring that our oligopoly situation doesn't continue to backslide for Canadians.
The second would be on the abuse of dominance side. Are we addressing the threat of abuse of dominance or are we just waiting for Canadians to be harmed and reacting well after the businesses may have failed?
Finally, I think there's an anchoring piece around the purpose of the competition law. We haven't looked at it since 1986. We're still too focused on things like efficiency, things that have led to consolidation.
If there were three big areas, they would be mergers, abuse of dominance and the core purpose of the legislation.