Well, that's the sixty-four thousand dollar question, how the courts will interpret it. One of my concerns is that when you use a word like “markedly”, the courts are going to ask what “markedly” is. You're then going to have to call expert evidence and so forth. It could be difficult. That's why I suggested that we could be back before this committee with amendments to amendments. It's really to deal with these third party money launderers: the people who are not involved in the actual drug trafficking, but are doing the money laundering for them.
How do you differentiate the criminal entities doing that work from other money services businesses and so forth that are doing legitimate work? That's the problem.