Speaking carefully, because it's a small group of people who are associated with the tribunal, I think that part of it is the original structure of how the tribunal was created. It has a right of appeal. It's not quite a court, not quite an administrative tribunal. It's trying to thread the needle, and I don't think it's threading it the right way. If we really want an expert tribunal that can make its own decisions based on competition principles and maybe not be encumbered by the process of courts and some of the binding precedent rules and so on, then we should look at that seriously; but that's not what's happening right now.
However, I also think we really need to diversify the decision-makers. There has to be a judicial member, but does it need to be a Federal Court judge? Do we need to have a federally based tribunal, or should we look to a model where we use the regular courts? I think there are different opinions on that, but we haven't really studied the question.