I can speak to the amendment.
Following up on what I said earlier, the approach that's taken in this bill is to provide broad exemptions that are not sector-specific. As I mentioned earlier, our analysis is that the group ratio rule I discussed should in most cases provide the appropriate relief.
Beyond that, in terms of the technical aspects of the amendment, it would amend the bill, specifically the exemption that applies right now for P3 projects, so for public-private partnerships. Right now that's an exemption that requires four conditions to be met. As drafted, this amendment would add four additional conditions to that exemption.
Our interpretation is it would have the effect of making that exemption effectively unattainable. It would also require that a regulated industry meet those other four conditions that are already in the bill. Effectively, it would be eight conditions that need to be met in order for the exemption to apply.
Our interpretation of this is that it would probably not have the effect that we think was intended.