Again, that would be my understanding of it. The commissioner came here and testified that in his view in the U.S., the authorities considered that it's zero harm to competition. At the same time, when you look at the text and the guidelines and so on, it never talks about zero competition. It talks about remedying the problem and remedying the harm. That's, to your point, a very technical area of law.
What I think we feel more comfortable saying is that in the Canadian context, because we're not experts on all the laws of competition around the world, it seems that it would create a different standard for a challenge and for the remedies. That is something we feel.