I am not disagreeing, but this is a bit unusual, so I just want to make sure I understand.
We have amended one section, but in order to make it consistent, we had to open up different sections in legislation in order to make this consistent. Is that correct? Yes.
My question, though, is for the clerk, because if the chair rules that something is out of scope, one of the things that can happen is that even if we override your decision—not that we ever would, Peter—the Speaker can then come back and say this is out of scope and throw it out, regardless.
I am just curious. Is there any chance that might happen with this piece of legislation, because we're opening up other pieces of legislation?