Okay. Thank you for that.
Hopefully, that sets Mr. Ste-Marie's mind at ease a bit.
I would also like to raise one more concern with regard to the particular wording of this amendment.
I think there's a bit of a concern that, when you reference one specific province in federal legislation, you're essentially embedding in the law itself an exemption with specific reference to one province but to the exclusion of others. I don't think that's appropriate for federal legislation, even though I understand Mr. Ste-Marie has some legitimate concerns about whether psychoeducators are included. I think we've heard testimony to say that they are in fact included. I hope we can move on from this.
For the reasons I mentioned, we will not be supporting this one.
Thank you.