The concern with this scenario could be that a company feels emboldened to attempt to not provide some information. I think that's what this is attempting to get at—standing behind a trade secret as a reason for not providing the means for diagnosis or repair.
Our assessment is that the bureau and, of course, the tribunal would be able to manage it, see through it and distinguish between the provision of the means for diagnosis and repair versus the revealing of information that goes behind the product itself.