That is correct.
Thank you very much for the question. I will answer in English.
This is just to make sure I'm clear in my response.
The reason for setting the penalty at $50,000 was that it was administrative, and that penalty is one tool of many that we could use to compel the industry to pay the charge it would need to pay the government as a result of the cost recovery framework.
In terms of what the implications would be, it really just explains why, when we put forth the amendments to the cost recovery framework, the penalty was set at $50,000. On changing the fee, I would say there's no implication from our perspective.
Thank you.