Thanks.
Mr. Angus is my substitute. I'll make my last point, and then I'll turn it over to Mr. Angus.
On Friday, we were debating a subamendment, and no motions are permitted to be moved when we're debating a subamendment. The Conservatives—I think it was Mr. Chambers, but I'm not sure who it was—said that he wasn't moving the motion; he was reading it into the record. Therefore, it has already been read into the record.
I'd ask you, Mr. Chair, to rule on this. Some of us thought there was an attempt to move a motion at a time when it couldn't be done. If the true objective on Friday was simply to read it into the record, it has already been read into the record.
This is a continuation of that meeting. The meeting was suspended on Friday, not adjourned, so we're in the same meeting.
I don't think you can read it into the record twice. If Mr. Hallan's true purpose was to simply read the motion into the record, then that has been done. He asserts that he's simply reading it into the record, but that can't possibly be the case because it has already been done.