I did explain the relevance, Mr. Chair. Perhaps I'll explain it again. I'll have to back up because maybe Mr. Turnbull wasn't listening.
This is directly relevant because the subamendment calls for the Minister of Finance to come to the committee. I'll read it again: “the week of the 28th one meeting be dedicated to hearing from the Minister [of Finance] for two hours”.
This issue of the letter from the finance minister is relevant because she is the finance minister, and the subamendment, which we are currently debating, calls for her to appear at this committee. I don't think you could rule that it is not relevant, Mr. Chair, but you're free to give it a go if you like.
In any event, I'll just finish reading the letter. It's almost done:
After conducting the review, the Committee would be required to submit a report to Parliament recommending any changes—