On a point of order, no doubt, based on Mr. Genuis's comments, I'm able to make a point of order at any time.
I just want to ask for relevance again. Mr. Genuis has gone on for a good length of time about something that happened yesterday, on which, quite frankly, I think you ruled fairly.
I know that Mr. Genuis did not contest the chair's ruling on that; if he had, we could have voted on that. In any case, my main point is, could he get back to the matter at hand, and could you encourage him to stay relevant? There is a standing order on that, which I can cite if you would like.