Even in a world-class system, there should be continued review and scrutiny of improvements that could be applied. I don't think we're opposed to those discussions, but those discussions should be transparent. They should be done through proper analysis and through proper debate at committee, none of which has taken place here.
As an industry, we believe that the safety and the efficacy of these products are of the utmost importance, but achieving improvements is not done through omnibus bills. It's done through proper debate, which has been excluded in this process.