Capital funding is the initial contribution if we're developing new.... That initial contribution, like for any of us who have a house, ultimately lowers the operating cost because it lowers your mortgage and, therefore, can be more affordable, so that's capital and why it is required for affordable housing.
The operational funding, then, is really more geared towards, “How affordable?” That's why the ask is for a rental subsidy for low income, just to ensure that it can be no more than 30% of their income. Some new programs and language are now talking about the average market income and it not being over a certain percentage of the average market income, but that's problematic if the average market income just keeps increasing. If it's not tied to income and there's no rental subsidy, again, that will lead to some homelessness and, as we talked about, a reduction in productivity and impacts on the availability of staff for businesses.
The operational is really, probably, less about operating costs of a building but more about how to ensure we keep the homes affordable so that those who have lower incomes or deep needs have the income to contribute to the cost of running or operating the housing.
I hope that answers your question.