In terms of red tape, I would maybe come back with more information. I know that, concerning costs on accessibility requirements, some programs with funding have accessibility requirements and energy efficiency requirements that can add but can also save in the long term.
I think that, with accessibility, what we have asked in the past is that the accessibility requirements not be based on a single project but look more portfolio-wide, because at times there is no particular local need for accessibility, so there might be units built but not necessarily used.
Other than that, the administration and reporting back from a funding program can sometimes add to cost, but that's not necessarily to your question about the administrative costs or red tape for constructing or building new housing. I separate those, because I think you might get comments on administration as well on reporting.