Thank you for that answer.
There's also the fact that they waited a year and a half and did this a few days after the U.S. election, knowing that the president-elect wanted to make this a key issue. In our opinion, that really adds fuel to the fire.
My understanding of the rules of procedure is that, as far as the bill is concerned, the Senate could reject the amendment. If not, the bill will be returned to us as amended, and it will be up to the House to reject the amendments and send it back. However, with the election looming, time may be running out. So I find that truly shameful. They're thumbing their noses at all of our farmers under this system. As you were saying, just about every country has safeguards, and the United States is no exception. It's truly shameful.
I want to come back to your presentation. You talked about investments to help adapt to climate change. You said that the United States is already doing this, and if Canada were to invest as much, that would amount to $2 billion a year over five years. Can you tell us what these programs do, in concrete terms?
How would farms and farmers adapt to fight climate change and protect the environment?