Thank you.
I just wanted to add that it's not in this bill but rather in the general wage and rent subsidy rules. There is a special deeming rule that provides that the month-over-month revenue decline for any particular period is going to be equal to the greater revenue decline for the prior period or the current one. That was added in order to provide certainty up front, at the start of a period, as to how much of a revenue decline would be used [Technical difficulty—Editor] for the purposes of these tests.
To go back to your example, where an applicant or entity has a revenue decline of 60% for a particular period, then for the next period we know that the revenue decline would be deemed to be no less than 60%. Of course, if in the current period the revenue decline was 70%, that would be the number used, but the special deeming rule in the existing wage and rent subsidy legislation provides some more flexibility on that.