Thank you.
There's a spirit that you see in the motion that does look at what we're supposed to be doing here, and I don't want to lose any of that in our discussions at the subcommittee. It is what I think Canadians are expecting us to look at here, and the impact on their financial system. I think nothing in here detracts from what we should be looking at, as Canada's House of Commons finance committee, in terms of the impacts of something that's never been done before.
I think it's wide open. I would go back to my proposition to you to add “subject to”. That's the spirit of this motion: Let's look at this very quickly, please, and if there's something that we're missing or some detail that needs to be changed, then let's please put in an amendment at the bottom that says it's subject to changes that will be agreed upon between parties at a subcommittee meeting on February 18.
I think we're covering it all. I haven't heard what the substantial, principal concerns are about the words that are on the page here. It is really about examining what this means to the Canadian financial system and to Canadians going forward.