That's a good question.
First, I would say that, in order to ensure parliamentarians are well informed, the government should specify who received funding. In the case of provincial and territorial transfers, that would mean specifying how much each received and how the money was, or will be, used. For instance, the report could indicate how many tests or supplies were purchased with the funding.
Second, when it comes to transfers to persons, the report should specify how many individuals received the federal funding by province or territory. That would provide a picture of the situation over time so that you, as lawmakers, could better understand how effective the measures were and determine whether the funding was being well spent. In other words, is the money being spent as intended?