Well, certainly the safeguard that we put in the legislation is this ongoing obligation on financial institutions to review the information they have in their possession. If somebody was, unfortunately, captured, which would seem unlikely but is possible, the person can contact the financial institution and review the information it has. It could be a question of mistaken identity. The bank in question can unfreeze the account based on the information provided. If they need additional information, they could approach the RCMP as well.
In the way it's been set up, it seems unlikely, in view of the fact that you need to use money and you need proof that it's towards an activity that is prohibited under section 2. I think it gives a very good basis to ensure that consumers are protected.