Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you for the discussion and for your willingness to debate this amendment. I appreciate it very much.
For my Bloc colleague Mr. Ste-Marie, I did hear one of the officials indicate that this did not apply to corporations. I suspect that in the example you provided, there may be some planning opportunities for individuals if they're looking to provide or transfer housing to their children. I would stress once again the importance of the facts that this measure is temporary, that it is time limited, that it does sunset and that two years is, in many cases, a fairly short time frame to give us a little bit more time.
With respect to some of the concerns about international trade, I certainly appreciate those concerns. I'm wondering why we're more worried about the international trade effects on a temporary measure as opposed to some of the concerns we had raised about a permanent tax with the original clause of the bill. Given that it is temporary and that we have not seen reciprocal arrangements from some of our other trading partners, including New Zealand as my colleague mentioned, I do think two years is a reasonable time, and it certainly is not permanent.
Thank you very much.